3.4.5 Grading Policy

Criteria	4+ (95%)	4 (90%)	3 (83.33%)	2 (66.67%)	1 (50%)
Code Functionality	Code exceeds expectations with extra features or enhancements.	Code runs flawlessly and meets all the project requirements.	Code runs with minor bugs but meets most project requirements.	Code runs with significant bugs, meeting some requirements.	Code does not run or fails to meet project requirements.
Code Efficiency	Code is highly optimized with zero redundancy.	Code is efficient with minimal redundancy.	Code is generally efficient, but with some inefficiencies.	Code has several inefficiencies or redundant parts.	Code is highly inefficient, with poor logic and excessive redundancy.
Creativity and Innovation	Exceptional creativity with novel problem-solving approaches.	Demonstrates good creativity with unique ideas.	Shows some creativity but relies on standard approaches.	Lacks significant creativity, using common solutions.	Lacks creativity, using basic or pre-existing solutions.
Documentation and Comments	Code is excellently documented with clear, detailed comments throughout.	Code is well-documented with adequate comments.	Limited documentation with comments for only some parts.	Documentation is sparse, with few explanations.	No documentation or comments, making the code difficult to understand.

This is how much each section is weighted (percent wise)

Let’s say a student receives the following scores:

Code Functionality (Weight: 40%):
- Score: 4+ = 95%
- 95% of 40 = 0.95 × 40 = 38 points
Code Efficiency (Weight: 25%):
- Score: 2/4 = 66.67%
- 66.67% of 25 = 0.6667 × 25 = 16.67 points
Creativity and Innovation (Weight: 20%):
- Score: 4/4 = 90%
- 90% of 20 = 0.90 × 20 = 18 points
Documentation and Comments (Weight: 15%):
- Score: 3/4 = 83.33%
- 83.33% of 15 = 0.8333 × 15 = 12.5 points